No entitlement to regulatory required intervention in a data protection supervisory matter
The parties disagree about the intervention of the defendant in a privacy supervisory matter. The plaintiff asked the Kreissparkasse ... ... ... repeatedly, his ... ... ... shared her personal data processed by him to übermitteln.3Die Kreissparkasse the applicant by letter of 30. July 2018 then with, to him in compliance with Art. 15 Abs. 1 and 2 to the Privacy Regulation (DS-ACE) such as § 34 the Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG) now convey its data (vgl. leaf 3 – 6 the court record, Conditioning the application). With a further letter of the same day, the Kreissparkasse told ... ... ... the plaintiff nor the credit rating his person with. By letter of 3. September 2018 turned ...
