Pressercht Archive - LawyerIT: IT Law

05th Sep 2023

IT procurement briefly explained

The awarding of IT projects is an important process, which is carried out by companies and public institutions, to find the best IT solutions for your needs. The IT procurement includes the tender, Evaluation and selection of IT service providers and products. The awarding of IT projects is an important process, which is carried out by companies and public institutions, to find the best IT solutions for your needs. horak. LAWYERS/ LAWYERS / PATENT ATTORNEYS Just give us a call. We are happy to help. A successful IT procurement requires careful planning and preparation. First, the requirements of the company or public institution must be clearly defined. This includes identifying the required IT solutions, the functionality, the performance and....

IP law

Intellectual Property: The invisible crown jewels of your company
When Leon enters his office on this Monday morning, everything seems as usual: Coffee is steaming, the laptop hums, The whiteboard still shows the sketch of the last product idea. But then he reads the email. A competitor has brought a surprisingly similar product onto the market - including the name, Design and almost identical functionality. Leon Puls is in a hurry. "The […]
sorts & Plant Variety Protection – Why plants are more than just species
When we talk about “varieties”., We don't just mean flowers or vegetables from the garden. From a legal perspective, varieties are economic values that require protection, Property rights and economic importance. From seed to harvest, from breeder to dealer: The correct handling of varieties is essential - and regulated by law. What does “variety” mean in law?? […]
Ideas are worth gold - if you protect them.
Why intellectual property (IP) Your most important capital can be - and how the iPblog helps you have an ingenious invention, A unique design or a strong brand concept? Then they already have more than many others - but: Only those who have their intellectual property (IP) protect, evaluated and cleverly administered, also has real economic benefits from it. […]

Importance of freedom in the assessment of an utterance as "harmful to minors" and the terms thereof finable requirement to appoint a youth protection officer
decisions, applied to the evaluation of a by Article. 5 Abs. 1 Set 1 socialize as harmful to minors adverse legal consequences GG protected expression, must take into account the value-setting significance of the fundamental right of freedom of expression. These principles are also to be observed, if not the expression itself is the subject of proceedings, but their evaluation is in turn the basis for a more onerous state measure. As far as making a classification of utterances as "harmful to minors" the basis for the finable requirement to appoint a youth protection officer, must also be considered as part of the proportionality test, the importance of having such a requirement for the possibility of freedom of expression of those affected. This has the 2nd Chamber of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court today ...
E-mail advertisements represent persistent and undesirable addressing of the users of the e-mail services
1. Art. 13 Abs. 1 Directive 2002/58 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12. July 2002 on the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in electronic communication (Privacy policy for electronic communications) in the by Directive 2009/136 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25. November 2009 the amended version is to be interpreted accordingly, that the display of advertising messages in the inbox of a user of an e-mail service in a form, which is similar to that of an actual email, and in the same place as such an email, a "use of ... electronic mail for the purposes of direct mail" within the meaning of this provision, without determining the recipient of these messages ...
Facebook and other social networks are not allowed to simply delete hateful posts or block accounts
Judgments 29. July 2021 – III ZR 179/20 and III ZR 192/20 Der III. Civil Division of the Federal Court held, that the terms and conditions of Facebook dated 19. April 2018 for deleting user contributions and blocking accounts in the event of violations of the communication standards set out in the conditions are ineffective. In any case, this is true, because the defendant provider is not obliged to do so at the same time, to inform the user about the removal of his contribution at least retrospectively and about an intended blocking of his user account in advance, to inform him of the reason for this and to give him the opportunity to respond with a subsequent new decision. If a user's contribution was deleted due to the ineffective terms and conditions and his account was temporarily blocked, Has...

Copyright horak . Lawyers / Fachanwälte / patent attorneys: Intellectual Property, Author- and Media Law, IT Law, Competition Law, Kartellrecht Theme by Towfiq I.