LawyerIT: IT Law

1. Art. 2 Abs. 1 BUCHST. c of Council Directive 2006/112 / EC of 28. November 2006 on the common system of VAT is to be interpreted, standing that transactions such as those at issue in the main proceedings, consisting Exchange conventional currencies in units of virtual currency "Bitcoin" and vice versa, which are executed for an amount, corresponding to the margin, represented by the difference between the price, to which the economic operator concerned buys currencies, and the price, at which he sells them to its customers, is formed, constitute paid services provided for the purposes of that provision. 2. Art. 135 Abs. 1 BUCHST. e of Directive 2006/112 must be interpreted, that services such as ...

The applicant is users of the Inter platform facebook. He commented in the past two to three years in at least a hundred cases, among other posts from politicians and the media with the sentence: "Refugees: interned for as long, until they voluntarily leave the country!“. until 28. More 2018 this sentence remained on facebook unopposed. On the night of 29. More 2018 deleted facebook this post, because it was contrary to their community standards, especially against their standards of "hate speech". In addition, Facebook blocked the applicant for thirty days from all activities. The claimant in the way of interlocutory, to prohibit facebook, To delete the quoted comment or to .. him because of this commentary on facebook.

a) Der lauterkeitsrechtliche Schutz eines durch Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen ausgestalteten Ge-chäftsmodells vor gezielter Behinderung im Sinne von § 4 No.. 4 UWG durch Missachtung der Geschäfts-bedingungen setzt grundsätzlich voraus, dass die missachteten Geschäftsbedingungen in die Verträge des Verwenders einbezogen werden und der Inhaltskontrolle standhalten. This also applies, wenn der Hersteller, Vertreiber oder Veranstalter eines Spiels in seinen Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen die Spielregeln niedergelegt hat. Er verdient den lauterkeitsrechtlichen Schutz vor einer gezielten Behinderung durch einen Verstoß gegen die Spielregeln nur, wenn diese Spielregeln rechtlich verbindlich sind (Fortfüh-rung von BGH, Judgment of 30. April 2014 – I ZR 224/12, Wheat 2014, 785 Rn. 32 = WRP 2014, 839 – Flugvermittlung im Internet)....